How Bad Were These Breaches?Īccording to NordVPN's statement, an attacker gained access to its server in Finland in March 2018 using a remote access feature that was left in place on the server. Given that, I'm going to summarize what I understand about the breaches and how PCMag arrived at our decision to regarding the scores of these two VPNs. These products are intended to protect people and when they fail in protecting people, they're worse than just bad purchases: They put people at risk. I'm fortunate that PCMag readers trust my reviews, and I know I have a particularly special responsibility when it comes to evaluating security and privacy products. How can I believe anything that's being said, since the companies involved have a powerful financial motivation to put the best spin on the situation? It's an especially fraught situation in the VPN industry, which has an unfortunate history of skullduggery. Should I compare one company's response to another's and pick a winner? That's not fair, as blind luck could have been a factor in these outcomes. Questions like, is it fair to penalize a company for being involved in an attack? Maybe another company has terrible security practices, but just wasn't targeted. I especially hate this situation because it poses really difficult questions that don't have particularly satisfying answers. VikingVPN has not updated its blog in quite some time and it has been almost two years since the company's Twitter account was active.Īs a reviewer, I hate days like today, and not only because it required that I read some truly vile 8chan posts in order to find out the origin of this story. Both NordVPN and TorGuard have issued statements outlining the attack. I learned, like everyone else, that in the case of NordVPN and TorGuard VPN, someone managed to gain access to VPN servers leased by the companies. #Torguard vs nordvpn software#
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |